The conjecture analysis was conducted within an individual to respond to external audits and documentary assessment.
Tweet on Twitter Many public schools in the US have been struggling for many years, facing issues like overcrowding, underfunding and trouble students, among many others. And amid these problems, people are at a loss of who to blame or what to do.
However, one cause of these issues that many people point to is drug abuse, which is frequently on the minds of citizens who are looking to save the youth and guide them back to the right path. Now, one recommendation that is being raised to help address drug abuse in public schools is to mandate drug testing in these institutions.
To exactly know where to stand on this matter, it is best to look at the pros and cons of drug testing in schools. List of Pros of Drug Testing in Schools 1. It promotes a feeling of safety. By implementing such a test at school, people think that students will be safer, as illegal drug use will be discouraged and will no longer affect students in a way that it will cause problems for them.
This feeling of safety is believed to be what many parents need to willingly send their children to school. It can aid in proper counseling. Students who take drugs are putting themselves at risk of failing and being not able to graduate school.
If intervened early enough with proper counseling and supervision, they would be redirected towards the good path. It will be able to identify and deal with problem students.
Classrooms can fall apart when there is enough problem students around, more so if these children happen to be taking drugs. With drug testing, these children can be identified and removed from the classroom, giving teacher an easier time to reach other students who are not engaged in such a behavior.
List of Cons of Drug Testing in Schools 1. Some people see drug testing in schools as an attack on student rights. Also, they see it as unnecessarily invasive, which can result in parents and students seeing personal rights violated.
It serves as punishment for an activity done outside the campus. Critics are asking what drug testing really means to solve or prove.
They cite an example where excelling students who actually do drugs at home would be punished for an activity they do outside the campus if drug testing in schools is mandated.
These students would be put at risk of being not able to pursue their education because of such a policy. It would require a great deal of funding. Basically, drug tests cost a lot of money, which would not be helpful to school districts who are already struggling with budget.
There are schools that are already implementing random drug tests, seeing the benefits of such a move. However, drug testing in schools also has some drawbacks that cannot be ignored. On your end, do you think it is good for society, or not?Abstract. Disturbingly high levels of illicit drug use remain a problem among American teenagers.
As the physical, social, and psychological “home away from home” for most youth, schools naturally assume a primary role in substance abuse education, prevention, and early identification.
Implementing tablets in K schools requires purchasing hardware (the tablet) and software (the textbooks), building new wi-fi infrastructure, and training teachers and administrators how to . The audio-visual format of our highly successful drug prevention and education curriculum makes it possible for a school or group to receive the Narconon program, no matter where they are located, and has been used in over 8, schools throughout the U.S.
Counselling Education for Social Problems in Schools The aim of this research is to establish problems encountered by students, and they have no possible way of .
Based on work place drug testing policies, Random Student Drug Testing (RSDT) programs require certain groups of students (e.g., those belonging to a sports team or club) to be drug tested at school.
Drug tests are usually in the form of a urinalysis, which detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, PCP and opioids. Implementing too many facts will produce a dry, lifeless introduction and will overshadow your Imagine that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is presented with a series of studies testing the effectiveness of a new drug.
There are some laboratory tests that produce fairly consistent colleges, institutions of higher education and.